The first was the setting the second was a dream and the third was a rather cheap pun stolen from nietzsche s first book.
Attic tragedy nietzsche.
Friedrich nietzsche at the end of the 19th century highlighted the contrast between the two main elements of tragedy.
It is nietzsche s dithyrambic drama thus spoke zarathustra that provides the apprehension he writes about in the very first sentence of the birth of tragedy.
In order to justify his relentless quest to find dionysus at the heart of attic tragedy nietzsche writes that we must not trust what we find on the surface of sophoclean and aeschylean dialogue.
Nietzsche stressed the importance of living with a tragic awareness of life and asserted that only through the cultivation of such a state could genuine growth creativity greatness and the capacity to truly affirm life be attained.
Nietzsche believed that attic tragedy was the synthesis of these forces.
We have emphasized apollo for so long that it is very difficult for us to embrace dionysus especially if we have been brought up in christianity truly an apollonian religion if there ever was one.
In the birth of tragedy nietzsche expounds on the origins of greek tragedy and its relevance to the german culture of its time.
The birth of tragedy.
The attic tragedy was born from three separate inanimate ideas that rattled around inside me for two or three years before striking together and sparking a story.
Euripides founded new attic comedy and was nietzsche claims the first to bring the spectator onto the stage.
Nietzsche uses this section to refine his conception of the epiphany that is reached when the apollonian and the dionysian come together in one art form.